Howard was talking about Carrie Fisher and wondered out loud whether Fisher is older than him. Robin blurted out "Yes." Then she checked it out and found that Carrie is 53 (Howard is 56) and said so. How about checking before speaking?
Posted by Silent But Deadly 01/30/2010 6:08 PM I would like to clarify this submission and exactly what happened.
Howard asked, "How old is Carrie Fisher? Is she older than me?"
Robin answered, "Yeah." Exactly 3 seconds later, Robin continued, "I think. Maybe." A moment of silence as you could feel Robin was looking it up. JD, also in the studio at the time, suggested IMDB for the look up.
Posted by inotherwords 01/29/2010 4:23 PM I've noticed Howard saying "Riiight..." after a lot of Robin's babbling. He's either being sarcastic or isn't paying attention at all thinking about what he's going to do next.
Posted by Rob 01/29/2010 10:26 AM Another example of her speaking out just to be involved in a conversation was on Monday (replayed this morning) when they were talking about the Haiti telethon and she admitted not seeing it but still kept butting in about it. Finally Howard said to her while they were speaking about the musical performances and she kept chiming in "you don't know what you are talking about". It was great to finally hear that from him and directed at her.
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/29/2010 4:13 AM Let's not forget that first she said "Yeah:, then "I think so", then "Maybe". All in a matter of two seconds. The woman has to speak out as being correct before her brain has even realized she may be wrong. Then finally when told that Howard was indeed older and she was wrong, the classic Robin response, "Really?"
Robin Won't Back Down! Show Date: Wednesday 01/27/2010 -- Submitted 01/27/2010 4:32 PM by Robin Observer
The gang was discussing who will replace Simon Cowell on American Idol. Howard said he would be a good choice because he's a musician. Robin replied "You're not a musician." At that point Gary & Howard listed many examples demonstrating why Howard is a musician including: His authorship of Psychedelic Bee, his musical instrument playing, his discovery of Suzanne Vega, his direction to David Grohl to use an acoustic arrangement of a song that proved commercially successful, his best selling record and others. In the face of overwhelming evidence that Howard is indeed a musician, Robin refused to concede the point. 34 strikes again!
Posted by HeHateMe 01/28/2010 11:18 PM Another example is a few weeks ago she was late because she was coming in on the red eye. Howard and George Takei sat and talked for about 40 minutes and it was so nice. As soon as she came traipsing in the moment was ruined. I sent Howard an e-mail saying how nice it was without Robin but I know it did no good.
Posted by Rob 01/28/2010 2:43 PM If Howard needed any proof of how annoying her interruptions are then all he would have to do is listen the replay of his interview with Rosie when he went to Rosie's studio. It was great because Robin never opened her mouth because she was not there and it was wonderful to listen to.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/27/2010 10:35 PM Right Rob and it has gotten worse the last few weeks. Howard will begin to say something and Robin will butt in and take over the conversation. What really gets me is when he brings a subject up, she jumps in and says, 'Well I think......' I just wish one day Howard would jump her ass and tell her to quit interrupting because we don't care what she thinks. I don't think it will ever happen though.
Posted by Rob 01/27/2010 8:49 PM Again Robin''s jealousy of Howard comes out as it did when she said she was upset that the 60 Minutes piece focused completely on Howard and never discussed how much she is a part of the show. She really thinks the show is as much hers as it is Howard's.
Appear On a Show; Watch a Show, It Is All The Same to Robin Show Date: Tuesday 01/26/2010 -- Submitted 01/28/2010 4:40 PM by bleeding ears
While discussing the return of American Idol, Robin did a story of a young woman (Erica Rhodes) who was a former Barney kid. She appeared on the Barney show when she was a child. This story was in the news because she appeared on Idol with a whip in an attempt to portray a dominatrix. Not only did Robin fail to mention the whip and outfit, she replied to Howard's question "what is a Barney kid?" as "someone who watched Barney as a child, I guess." She had no clue about the two important aspects to the story. Rather than guessing, perhaps she should put a modicum of effort into her job.
Posted by bleeding ears 01/29/2010 10:30 PM Admin, I see your point. In the words of the late great Emily Litela (Gilda Radner)..."never mind."
Posted by Admin 01/29/2010 6:19 PM bleeding ears: Actually, that wouldn't be difficult at all for me to do since this site is run with a database. However, I'm reluctant to do something like that because I used to have a counter in the sidebar that showed how many submissions each poster had, and many of the posters seemed to hate that. It was treated as a competition to see who could get the most posts, and people who weren't near the top of the list resented it being visible to others.
I'm afraid your idea might be much of the same. I'm all in favor of making improvements to the site, but the most important thing is I want to make it a pleasant place for all people to read and post. Based on the previous feedback I've gotten, the people are generally not in favor of individual submitters being credited or noted beyond the small line under the headline.
Posted by bleeding ears 01/29/2010 5:59 PM D-Bagz, thank you for the welcome, however I have submitted a few articles previously.
To Admin, is it possible to have a summary of submissions listed by those who post it? For example, is it possible to have an alphabatized list of posters and their submissions listed under the names? I know this is site is a hobby and if that is a lot of extra work, I understand. I don't mean to make extra work for you.
Posted by inotherwords 01/29/2010 4:19 PM I was just thinking that maybe she is allowed to do the news so people go to the Stern site to see the news links to get the pertinent facts. Nah, she's just lazy.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/28/2010 10:48 PM Welcome aboard bleeding ears, nice submission. That's funny because who has ever heard of Barney defining a generation?
Vicious vs. Viscous Show Date: Tuesday 01/26/2010 -- Submitted 01/26/2010 10:10 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
It has been Gary vs. Yucko recently. After Gary's attack on Yucko, Gary sent Yucko an email apologizing for being so vicious.
Yucko called in this morning, and during the call revealed that Gary spelled "vicious" wrong. Yucko said Gary wrote "viscious." (The gang then teased Gary, pronouncing what Gary wrote as "viscous," a thick, sticky fluid, as everyone knows.)
Gary said over his squawk box that he did indeed spell "vicious" correctly and that Yucko was wrong.
Howard then asked Gary: "Spell 'vicious' right now."
Gary: "v-i-s-c-i-o-u-s."
Howard: "That's right."
Robin: "Yeah!" (Robin was so sure Gary was right and that "vicious" is spelled v-i-s-c-i-o-u-s.)
Fred (jumping in immediately): "No!" Fred eventually spelled it correctly for everyone, after which Robin admitted: "I was wrong."
A second mistake was also made by Robin in that she did not recognize that "viscous" has only one "i" (it is not spelled "viscious). (The word "viscous" was talked about a lot and then defined during this whole converstation.)
OK, in fairness to Robin, both Howard and Gary also believed "vicious" is spelled "viscious" and "viscous" is spelled "viscious."
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/27/2010 10:11 PM In the second to the last paragraph in my submission, I made a mistake. Sorry.
I meant to type:
"A second mistake was also made by Robin in that she did not recognize that "viscous" does not contain the letter "i" (it is not spelled 'viscious')."
Robin Messes Up The Facts About The 1994 Attack On Olympic Skater Nancy Kerrigan Show Date: Tuesday 01/26/2010 -- Submitted 01/26/2010 12:57 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
During her news segment, Robin reported the story of the death of Nancy Kerrigan's dad.
Robin asked Howard if he knew who Kerrigan is. Howard did, of course, and brought up the physical attack against her in 1994.
Robin said that Tonya Harding and her ex-husband Jeff Gillooly hired a couple of guys to attack Kerrigan with bats to knock her out of the Olympics.
Robin was wrong. It was just one guy who was hired, not a couple of guys. Gillooly and Harding's bodyguard, Shawn Eckhardt, were co-conspirators with Harding. The three of them hired Shane Stant to strike Kerrigan on the knee.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/26/2010 9:58 PM To add to this, the attack was not done with a bat. A collapsible baton was used which is much smaller than a bat.
Robin is Clueless About P Diddy's Kid's Party Show Date: Tuesday 01/26/2010 -- Submitted 01/26/2010 10:14 AM by Robin Observer
Robin was doing a story on P Diddy's son Justin's lavish 16th birthday party when she paused (with Fred playing her theme music in the background) to opine that perhaps P Diddy's son isn't getting exposed to the real world with his wealthy lifestyle and that it might be better for him to live in a more realistic view of the world. Then she said he would be a better person if he did something like contribute to Haitian relief. Howard immediately jumped in to point out that in fact young Justin Combs was donating his birthday presents to Haitian relief. Howard was not quite right. As reported by the New York Post, guests were asked to donate to Haitian relief instead of giving gifts.
http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/super_day_for_diddy_son...
Robin Reports That 'Avatar' Broke The World Box Office Record This Past Weekend. It Did Not Show Date: Monday 01/25/2010 -- Submitted 01/25/2010 1:55 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
During her news segment, Robin reported that "Avatar" has now overtaken "Titanic's" total gross and as of this past weekend became the highest grossing film of all time.
Robin is wrong.
While "Avatar" will overtake "Titanic" shortly, it has not yet done so, as Robin erroneously reported this morning.
Box office total through Sunday, January 24, 2010:
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/28/2010 8:12 PM Thank you, HeHateMe!
Posted by ng 01/28/2010 7:05 PM we all want hugs from Dora!
Posted by HeHateMe 01/27/2010 10:43 PM I want a virtual hug too. But from Dora. No offense OQTW, but I'm a male too.
Keep up the good work on your submissions. There have been many times I logged on to submit something only to find you have beaten me to it or I will submit something and admin posts yours instead of mine. I always agree that your submission was much better than mine though.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/27/2010 12:56 PM Thank you very much, Dora, for your sweet comment.
I really appreciate it.
Virtual hug to you!
Incidentally, I am male, and I agree with you this site is supposed to be and is fun.
Posted by Dora 01/27/2010 8:10 AM I respectfully disagree. OQTW's post are some of the most solid. He (I am assuming you are a "he" - please correct me and forgive me if I am mistaken), takes the time to research some of the more complicated and intricate mistakes. He has been a contributor since the site began and I can honestly say I would miss his submissions. Perhaps if his submissions were not as articulate or well written the length would be an issue. Since the Admin has the ability to edit these posts as he sees (I believe I personally have had some posts edited), I think they are fine as written. OQTW please do not change a thing!!!! This site is supposed to be and IS fun and light hearted. I enjoy reading all the submissions and would hate to have people edit or not submit for fear of criticism.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/26/2010 7:44 PM OQTW, I'm not trying to give you a hard time. No one around here seems to have a sense of humor. Concerning this post, I think the genesis of Robin's error was the headline of the article she read from. I saw it in the New York Post yesterday but it's gone now. The headline said that AVATAR was the new box office champ but the text of the article set out the exact figures you reported, indicating that it had not yet passed TITANIC. Apparently, Robin went by the headline and didn't study the figures. This is still a Robin error but I think that's how it occurred.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/26/2010 3:00 PM Good idea, Rob. I did it, and it's easy to do at howardstern dot com.
And thanks, Dora, for the nice expression. It's a nice counter to the negative expressed about my submissions by Robin Observer. He had a couple of submissions rejected recently and decided to express that my submissions are too long. I replied that he is correct and I would try to keep them as short as possible. I agree that I can get wordy sometimes. But then he decided to mention it a second time in the comments. I was OK with his first expression of it. I do mind though he repeated it just out of the blue, especially after I said I would try to be less verbose when submitting.
Posted by Rob 01/26/2010 2:30 PM I think everyone who enjoys this site should be emailing the link of it to the show and bombard them with it until they mention it. I've done it several times.
Posted by Dora 01/26/2010 9:48 AM I heard this after reading an Entertainment Weekly article which at press time stated Avatr was likely to surpass Titanic but had not yet. Whats really said, is I just figured she was wrong. Thanks for taking the time to look this up OQTW.
Posted by Admin 01/26/2010 2:00 AM I've never really sought any publicity for the site, but if you want to call into to the show and mention it, please feel free.
Posted by baddabing 01/26/2010 1:08 AM Nice Work!
Anyone know if this site has gotten any airtime lately?
Hopefully yes!
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/25/2010 8:27 PM The figures reported for the weekend were estimates as of early Monday morning (which Robin and anyone can easily access). Since I submitted this, the actual figures were counted and released (Monday afternoon).
Worldwide Total Actual Figures Through Sunday, January 24:
Titanic: $1,842,800,000
Avatar: $1,839,700,000
USA Domestic Box Office Only Actual Figures Through Sunday, Jan. 24:
Titanic: $600,800,000
Avatar: $551,700,000
Robin Messes Up While Reporting The Plot Of 'The Tooth Fairy' Show Date: Thursday 01/21/2010 -- Submitted 01/25/2010 12:55 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
During her news segment, Robin reported on the upcoming release of "The Tooth Fairy" starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson.
Howard asked Robin how The Rock becomes the Tooth Fairy. Robin told Howard that he just wakes up one morning and he is the Tooth Fairy.
Robin was wrong. (This is one of those times Robin should have just said she didn't know, instead of yet again misleading Howard and the audience.)
Here are the facts of the plot, which directly answers Howard's question:
Johnson plays Derek “The Tooth Fairy” Thompson, an NHL has-been who recently was relegated to sideshow status in the minor leagues, only brought on to please fans with bone-crushing hits that literally knock teeth out. Derek’s major problem, however, is that he crushes dreams, telling one child fan that he will never get into the NHL, and to “lower his expectations.” Later on, Derek steals money from under his girlfriend’s daughter’s pillow for a poker game and tries to tell her the Tooth Fairy doesn’t exist, something his girlfriend Carly (Ashley Judd) considers so offensive she kicks him out of the house. That night, Derek is transported to Fairy Land, where he meets his court worker Tracy (Stephen Merchant) and the head fairy Lily (Julie Andrews), who sentences him to two weeks of tooth fairy community service for his “dissemination of disbelief.”
Robin reported that the Huntington Meat Packing Company of California had been subject to a recall of "390,000 tons of beef." Whenever Robin "reports" a story involving numbers, it is always suspect and worth verifying. It turns out the recall was of "390 tonnes" of beef. http://feedraider.com/item/2010/1/190089561/Huntington-Meat.... Robin was off by a factor of 1,000. There's another aspect to this story - "tonnes" are not the same as "tons." A ton is 2,000 pounds while tonnes are 2,200 pounds (1,000 kilograms). The story reported the total weight as "864,000 pounds." This corresponds to 432 tons or 392.73 tonnes. In the US, when people hear mention of tons, they are taught to assume 2,000 pounds. Tonnes are more commonly used in countries where metric measurements are the standard. Tonnes are also referred to as "long tons." Obviously, Robin knows nothing about any of this!
Posted by inotherwords 01/22/2010 3:12 PM This site is my FAAAVORITE!
Posted by Microtech 01/22/2010 10:28 AM Al, even if she was talking about tonnes, she said 390 THOUSAND when the number was 390.
Posted by robinscucumber 01/21/2010 8:33 PM Dear Robin Observer,
I picked up on that immediately. In fact, if Robin would stay with the times she would have known this story two days earlier. It was yesterdays news when she reported....reported it wrong. Thank Heavens for real reporters.
Posted by Al 01/21/2010 7:50 PM How do you know she was not talking about "tonnes".She may have round out the numbers.
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/21/2010 6:16 PM Is Robin Observer a teacher?
I now know way more about tonnage than I desired to know.
If "tonnes" are also referred to as "long tons," is it safe to assume "penisses" are referred to as "long penis"?
Have a nice weekend, everyone.
Robin Tells Everyone The New Republican Massachusetts Senator Is Named Chris Brown Show Date: Thursday 01/21/2010 -- Submitted 01/21/2010 10:56 AM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
One of the biggest news stories this week is the election of a Republican for senator of Massachusetts, taking over the late Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy's slot.
Howard had clips of the new senator embarrassingly telling people his daughters are available.
Robin shamefully volunteered that his name is Chris Brown.
Without hesitation and missing a beat, Howard corrected Robin and informed her his name is Scott Brown.
At the end of the discussion, Robin spoke up to tell everyone Chris Brown is the guy who beat up singer Rihanna.
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/26/2010 10:28 PM So the new Republican senator from Massachusetts beat up Rihanna? This is why I get all my important news from Robin Quivers, I don't think anyone else has reported this yet.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/22/2010 3:58 PM Nope, late stages of stupidity!
Posted by inotherwords 01/22/2010 3:11 PM Early stages of Alzheimer's?
Read Before Reporting Show Date: Thursday 01/21/2010 -- Submitted 01/21/2010 10:40 AM by Robin Observer
Robin was reporting on a story in which police were accused of sodomizing victims. In the middle of the story, Howard interrupted to ask what the police had used to sodomize the victims, an implement or perhaps their penis. Robin stated that she didn't know what the police allegedly used in committing sodomy. She then continued with the story and within 10 seconds read that the police had allegedly used a "police baton" in the offenses. What this demonstrates is that Robin is not a news woman. She is a person who reads stories that others stick under her nose and does no actual "reporting." Had she read the story in advance, she would have known that the police were alleged to have used a police baton. Quite revealing!
Posted by Anonymous (99.192) 01/22/2010 3:09 PM QUOTE"... there are also many TV reporters who are handed fresh stories they are to read on the air. Often as live, breaking news.... so perhaps Robin can be forgiven for not knowing the details in advance. "
I can accept that, but the major difference is that real newscaster/reporters can read coherently without sounding like a special ed dyslexic trying to read something handwritten by someone with Parkinson's. She typically scans the text and wixes up mords repeatedly. Fuck I miss Artie.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/21/2010 10:23 PM Thanks, D-Bagz. Great one-word to everyone: "Chilax." I like that.
I do agree with you that this is a solid submission since Robin continually and frustratingly does not do enough show prep in comparison to her salary. And I welcome all postings pointing this out.
I disagree though when you say there is a bias against Robin Observer. It might look that way since he kindly submits so much content to this site. But most of his submissions do not elicit a negative response. And just a few submissions below this one, you'll see someone going against a submission by Joe Bell concerning if Robin should know if American Airlines flies to Guatemala.
I think when a commenter posts a disagreeing opinion, they do so because they feel strongly for the belief. I doubt they care who the submitter is. If the comments turn to fighting, that's usually caused by hurt feelings, in my humble opinion.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/21/2010 9:23 PM You put it so eloquently OQTW. In other words, CHILAX!!! I think there is a bias against R.O. and this is a solid submission. The slogan of this webpage is "Righting Robin's Wrongs Daily" and being paid such money for being ill prepared is a "wrong."
As for being handed a fresh story, I don't recall much breaking news comin out of the Stern Show, asside from 9/11. The article referenced on Howard's website is dated from yesterday. She had PLENTY of time to prepare.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/21/2010 8:31 PM Does anyone else find it fascinating how serious many of the commenters take this site and the material posted?
Even if you dislike some of the comments, you have to appreciate the passion exhibited sometimes by the writer.
Why?
Because in the long run this site and the material posted is inconsequential to all of our lives. This site and what is written about Robin can bring no one any reward. RobinsNews perhaps exists as a tiny escape, or a source of entertainment. A place to vent a frustration. And yet, some can get angry or hurtful or passionate or demanding or insulting. And to me, this is an interesting, and maybe unexpected, result of the contents of this site. (A small human nature study?)
Admin, I didn't get out of TT's comment that he or she is upset. I got out of it more the writer is thinking there is some kind of injustice/unfairness here which struck him or her enough emotionally to have to express it. I am not necessarily agreeing with TT. I only point this out to bolster my point that the contents of this site are perhaps taken a bit too seriously by some. Quite interesting.
Posted by robinscucumber 01/21/2010 8:30 PM Tradio Tramp, Robin Observer was correct in commenting on Robins inability to be prepared for a show. Afterall, isn't that what she is being paid to deliver. The name of this site is Robins news and the purpose is to report goofs.
Posted by Al 01/21/2010 6:49 PM The answer to your question Admin. the weather people that's who. just saying
Posted by Admin 01/21/2010 6:45 PM Wow, Tradio Tramp, I hope you're not as upset as your comment suggests.
Many of us have long been frustrated with Robin's inability to read a news story before reporting it, and you are correct that this is not something new. But what makes it amusing is that Robin has all morning to read these news articles. She picks the stories she wants to report from among a stack of articles given to her daily by interns. She then has at least 4 hours to read the stories so she can report them properly, but she doesn't do that. She decides to do a cold read on every story.
So what we have here is an enormously narcissistic woman, who claims to be a "news reporter," who makes millions of dollars a year and puts in about 50% effort with regard to her job. That's worthy of making some fun of.
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/21/2010 6:28 PM Dear Robin Observer & Admin,
For years and years, Robin has repeatedly not known the facts of the news stories she reads prior to reading them.
Why then, Admin, would you post this submission in particular today?
This site, according to the words at the top, is to publish Robin's goofs and gaffes.
When Howard asked Robin what was used to sodomize the victim, Robin had not yet read the story in front of her. She rightfully answered "I don't know." Robin has been criticized for not just saying she doesn't know an answer but instead blurting out an incorrect answer.
Yes, Robin should read the news as job preparation, which has been complained about often on this site. We disrespect Robin for not knowing facts she should have learned the day of the initial news report.
But there are also many TV reporters who are handed fresh stories they are to read on the air. Often as live, breaking news. This particular story about the sodomy case is not exactly huge national news, so perhaps Robin can be forgiven for not knowing the details in advance.
Robin said she did not know the answer. It would be different if she had given Howard an incorrect answer. She read the details and got the answer. If you post this submission, you will perhaps have to post hundreds of this same thing, where she does not know the fine details of a news story until she reads the print-out.
Robin Observer is posting the facts that Robin doesn't read the news stories in advance as if this is something new and revealing. It is not.
Robin Tells Howard James Cameron Did The First Three "Terminator" Movies Show Date: Wednesday 01/20/2010 -- Submitted 01/20/2010 6:00 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Naturally, while paying big compliments to James Cameron, Howard discussed Cameron's previous credits. When Howard got to the "Terminator" movies, he pondered which of the 4 "Terminator" movies James Cameron did. (At first, Howard was not sure Cameron did the third movie.)
Robin jumped in immediately. Instead of her saying she did not know or was not sure, Robin made it pretty clear that Cameron did all but "Terminator 4." (Robin said it as if it was 100% fact.)
In fairness to Robin, Howard did not know the correct answer either, and he went along with Robin telling everyone that Cameron only skipped out on "Terminator 4."
A few moments later, someone put up on Howard's screen that Cameron did not do "Terminator 3." Robin immediately spoke up a little shocked, and asked "who did 3 then?" (Howard answered that he did not know.)
Admin Note: James Cameron is listed as a co-writer on Terminator 3 for "characters". I assume that to mean he probably had no involvement in the movie production, but he originally wrote the characters in the previous movies, so that would be the reason for the credit. The film was directed by Jonathan Mostow.
Posted by Dora 01/21/2010 7:42 AM I think this is a mistake Robin has made before.....
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/20/2010 9:43 PM MM, that's funny, since I did the same exact thing concerning James Franco. I, too, heard Robin proclaim James Franco has never been on the show and then Howard correcting Robin saying that Franco has been a guest in the studio.
I, too, searched Mark's Friggin and found no mention of Franco. I also searched Wikipedia and Google. No mention.
I think I remember Franco being on Howard's show, but since I am really trying to be careful to submit 100%-for-sure submissions, I decided not to submit this. Plus, no one in the back office confirmed Howard's assertion that Franco had been on the show before. And Robin seemed so sure Franco had never been on the show.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/20/2010 9:03 PM When someone says "did" a movie, it usually means directed. Anyone who watched T3 knows that Jim Cameron didn't direct that piece of crap.
Along that note, Bob Kane is still credited in Batman movies, even though he's been dead since 1998.
Posted by MM 01/20/2010 8:59 PM No one would have faulted Robin if she did not know which of the Terminator movies Cameron directed. Even though a lot of movie buffs would have known that Cameron did not direct the third movie, of course. Howard didn't know, but at least Howard started off saying he was not sure.
Robin decided to jump in and act like she was sure Cameron directed Terminator III. This gave Howard and the audience wrong information. Luckily there were people in the back to correct Robin's mistake.
But how many times must this happen before Robin learns her lesson? She does this same shit over and over again. She gives out information she is sure of which often affects Howard's continued talking on that subject. And then someone comes in and makes the correction.
Robin spoke up on yesterday's show so positive that actor James Franco has never been a guest on The Howard Stern Show.
Howard countered Robin immediately by saying that James Franco has indeed been on the show. The reason why I did not submit this is because I cannot verify which one is correct. I would tend to believe Howard, but I cannot find anywhere on the Internet that verifies Franco was a guest. I searched the archives at Mark's Friggin and found nothing.
Posted by Michael 01/20/2010 7:25 PM Admin, Howard was specifically referring to the movies James Cameron directed.
Robin's incorrect answer was specifically related to her stating Cameron as a director of the Terminator movies.
So, as you correctly surmised, even if Cameron had a hand coming up with part of the story for T3, Robin was still wrong since Cameron neither directed or produced T3. The Wikipedia article on T3 will confirm this.
Good submissions today. Robin keeps making the same type of mistakes over and over again. She is "Repeat Robin"!
New Description of a Primary Election Show Date: Wednesday 01/20/2010 -- Submitted 01/20/2010 10:45 AM by Robin Observer
Introducing a clip of Martha Coakley, the Democrat who lost to Republican Scott Brown in the special election in Massachusetts for the Senate seat formerly held by Ted Kennedy, Robin said: "Here's the woman who was hand-picked by the Kennedys" to replace Ted Kennedy in the US Senate. In fact, Coakley is the incumbent Attorney General of Massachusetts who earned the right to run for the open Senate seat by participating in a primary election and defeating three other candidates, U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano, City Year co-founder Alan Khazei and Celtics co-owner Steve Pagliuca. http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/12/09/03/3044-72/index.xml
Posted by JJ 01/25/2010 2:43 PM Another thing to add is she wasn't even backed by the Kennedys until about a week before the election; after polls were done that showed Brown was neck and neck with her.
U.S. Is 8th in Donations to Haiti? Show Date: Tuesday 01/19/2010 -- Submitted 01/21/2010 8:03 PM by Derek
Robin stated that the U.S. was #8 in contributions by country to Haiti. This is simply untrue. The U.S. is #1 in donations by government by corporations and by private citizens. The United States leads the way among developed nations with $114.5 million donated as of Wednesday, according to the U.N.. Robin is so anxious to make negative comments about the U.S. that fact checking is completely thrown out for her "news" segment.
Admin Note: NBC News reported tonight that Americans have topped $250 million in donations to Haiti. That's a lot of generosity. I also read previously that China donated $1 million. With China's size and economy, I think this is a paltry gift. China giving $1 million is about the economic equivalent of me personally giving a dime.
Robin stated what a big game it was upcoming between the Jets and the Colts and erroneously said "if the Jets win, they win the championship for their league." No, they would win the championship for their conference, the AFC. In order for them to win the league championship, more commonly referred to as the NFL World Championship, they would have to win the Super Bowl.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/20/2010 6:03 PM Just another lame attempt by 34 to butt into a conversation she knows nothing about and hear her own voice.
During one of the replay interviews on Monday's MLK Jr. break Robin's microphone was turned down about halfway so when she tried to talk over people you could barely hear her. It was nice.
Robin Misdiagnoses Mo'Nique As Having Diabetes Show Date: Tuesday 01/19/2010 -- Submitted 01/19/2010 9:42 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Actress Mo'Nique and her acceptance speech were discussed a lot.
Robin said she thinks Mo'Nique has diabetes.
Robin is wrong. Mo'Nique does not have diabetes.
But, just to be sure, I did extensive reading on Monique, such as her biography at Variety.com, her Wikipedia article, and her interview about health and weight loss at: http://www.philly.com/philly/phillywomen/...
I also did various Google searches to see if there ever was anything posted about diabetes and Mo'Nique having same. I found nothing.
Mo'Nique lost 40 pounds and has denied having a gastric bypass. She said she lost the weight naturally, and that her motivation for doing so is to stay healthy. She did not lose the weight because she has a disease.
Mo'Nique currently has a nightly talk show on BET. No mention she has any health problems on that show, either.
Robin Messes Up The Facts Of The Reported Deal Between NBC And Conan O'Brien Show Date: Tuesday 01/19/2010 -- Submitted 01/19/2010 12:04 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Howard brought up that he read the reports yesterday that Conan and NBC have reached a settlement where Conan will pocket $32.5 million dollars. Howard went on to say that NBC will be paying out over $40 million dollars, but the difference will be going to Conan's staff as severance pay.
Robin jumped in to contribute, assuredly reporting that there is a sticking point to the negotiations concerning Conan's intellectual property rights (such as Triumph The Insult Dog and the Masturbating Bear).
Howard immediately corrected Robin and informed her that the reports from yesterday informed that there is no more sticking point concerning intellectual property rights as if Conan gets $32.5 million dollars and his staff gets a big severance package, NBC gets to keep the rights to Conan's bits.
Robin then answered back with a shocked voice, saying she had not heard that.
Robin didn't hear or read about it because Robin does not do her job, which is show preparation by reading or watching the news the night before the show. I find this inexcusable and wish Howard would call her on it.
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/20/2010 10:06 PM If Robin gets her own show, I desperately want Gilbert Godfried to be co-host simply so we can listen to him interrupt her constant verbal dribble. I very much enjoy listening to him disrupt her attempts to read the news while I wonder at what point she will simply throw her hands up and give up. Unfortunately most of the time she's determined to ruin a very funny Gilbert by plugging away at her boring news read.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/20/2010 9:07 PM I heard Robin is going to replace Alex Trebec on Jeopardy.
Posted by Michael 01/20/2010 7:30 PM It was announced today the sticking point in the NBC vs. Conan negotiations is Conan wants $600,000 more in the settlement added to the $7.5 million-dollar severance package.
How about Conan take the $600,000 from his own $32.5 million dollars? Isn't $40,000,000 from NBC enough?
I agree about the opinion the Robin HLN Show if she ever got one would be awful. And the ratings would be nonexistent.
What incentive would there be for anyone to watch a Robin talk show? After all these years, Robin has failed to show she would be a good interviewer.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/20/2010 6:11 PM If (God forbid) Robin got her own show, what should it be called?
I vote for "34, I talk just to hear myself."
Posted by HeHateMe 01/20/2010 6:08 PM I thought it was funny that Howard said she should have her own HLN show but did not bother to offer her a show of her own on Howard 100 or Howard 101.
I can't believe that unfunny Joy Behar got a show but I'd rather listen to it than a Robin Show.
Posted by Dora 01/20/2010 3:39 PM She DID have her own show that failed....I think a few years back they recorded a few episodes for a talk show and it was so bad (I assume) they could not even get it aired.....
Posted by inotherwords 01/20/2010 3:02 PM I wish they WOULD give her her own show, just to see it fail. Imagine if she took callers, that would be great.
Posted by Rob 01/20/2010 2:34 PM Robin didn't even defend Howard when Joy asked about Howard's ego and rudeness, she just said "why would I care about that". As if to agree that he has a huge ego and is rude but she doesn't care about it.
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/20/2010 2:31 PM Dora, me too.
And did you see how Howard kept saying Robin should get her own show on HLN? How boring would that be?
Posted by Dora 01/20/2010 1:04 PM I cannot belive Joy Behar introduced her as an "Anchorwoman".
Posted by HeHateMe 01/20/2010 9:39 AM I'd rather listen to Wendy the Retard than Robin.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/19/2010 10:05 PM D-Bagz, you are so right.
Robin is overpaid.
I wonder if Robin truly knows that Howard Stern would have been successful no matter who he chose to be his "co-star." The show's success is truly ALL Howard Stern.
Howard could have selected Wendy the Retard to do Robin's job and the show would have been as successful. Which means Robin is so lucky, since her being there had nothing to do with the show's popularity and success.
Oh how I'd love to hear Howard reveal this to Robin one day.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/19/2010 9:44 PM What a dope, always keeping her mouth open 25 seconds longer than she needs too. Did you hear how Robin was talking about what construction workers and other blue collar workers would think about getting paid 40 million dollars to leave a job? I'm a blue collar worker, and I'm astounded that someone can get paid a million dollars to read news off of her ISPs home page!
Genealogy According To Quivers Show Date: Tuesday 01/19/2010 -- Submitted 01/19/2010 9:37 AM by Robin Observer
The gang was discussing the sad news of Dennis Hopper's terminal illness. They reminisced about Hopper's great movie roles and ended up listening to a clip of the famous scene in the movie TRUE ROMANCE in which Christopher Walken's character is interrogating Dennis Hopper's character. Walken's character reveals he is Sicilian and Hopper's character goes into a racist monologue explaining that Sicilians are part n*g**r. The monologue culminates in the comment: "your great great great great grandmother f*cked a n*g**r and she had a half n*g**r kid..." Robin's comment about Walken's character: "After he's told he's half black, he kills Dennis Hopper." Actually, based on the monologue, Hopper's character's great great great grandmother or grandfather was half black. That would make Walken's character 1/64 black according to my calculations. Robin was only off by a factor of 32!
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/19/2010 10:14 PM Ahhh, Robin Observer, you are assuming that one of the Walken character's other ancestors who came after his great, great, great grandmother did not also take up with a black person. If that happened, Walken's character might just be 1/32 black? 1/16 black if more than one?
Good submission, RO. Robin often gets math wrong, along with all the other subjects she gets wrong, like medicine and law and show business.
Posted by Anonymous (75.213) 01/19/2010 4:16 PM Of course, Robin should have said "after he was told he was part black..." But, Robin said half black, and did not catch her mistake.
Robin makes more errors than anybody else on the air. The totals are staggering.
Robin Messes Up Teddy Pendergrass' Age While Reporting His Death Show Date: Thursday 01/14/2010 -- Submitted 01/14/2010 1:52 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Posted by Anonymous (216.229) 01/16/2010 8:45 PM I didn't even know Teddy Pendergrass was sick. I thought he was a lot older too.
Posted by Ora 01/15/2010 7:28 PM I heard the story on the news about his death at least 5 times the previous day, and every time the age of 59 was mentioned. It was also posted in my local morning paper.
Robin should be ashamed of herself for not familiarizing herself with the news before coming to work. It makes me dislike Robin a lot, since I would kill to have her job, and I am not being paid to watch or talk about the news.
Dog Senses Earthquake. Robin Gets One Of The Facts Wrong Show Date: Thursday 01/14/2010 -- Submitted 01/14/2010 1:30 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
During her news segment, Robin reported the story of the dog who sensed an earthquake seconds before the quake hit.
This was a widely reported story yesterday, with video showing the labrador (named Sophie) lying on the floor just hanging out in the newsroom. She sniffs the floor a bit then she hops up and bolts across the room and out of frame.
A few seconds later, the camera shakes as the quake rocks the building. The shot then shows drawers sliding out and debris dropping from the ceiling as people run from the room.
Robin specifically reported that the dog jumped up and ran out of the building. This is factually incorrect, and I knew right away Robin was wrong because I had watched the news report on TV during the evening news last night. The report gave the accurate account: Sophie did a lap around the room trying to find her owner. They both made it out of the building safely.
So again, Sophie jumped up to run to her owner, who was also there in the building. She did not run out of the building before the quake struck, as Robin reported.
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/17/2010 3:50 PM HeHateMe, you have done it again. You have hit a comment out of the park.
Very funny.
I hope you will continue to add your humorous comments when possible.
I am still smiling: your dog runs out of the building whenever he hears Robin start the news.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/16/2010 8:36 PM My dog runs out of the room whenever he hears Robin start the news. I should follow him.
Posted by Anonymous (68.111) 01/15/2010 7:24 PM You are so right, InOtherWords. Good point.
I, too, felt frustratated when I heard Robin end her report on this story by stating that the dog ran out of the building before the quake struck, because like OQTW I heard the news report on Tv the previous day. The news reporter made it a point to tell the viewers both the dog and the owner made it out of the building safely.
You make a good point that Robin could quickly look up facts the Benji often does during the show, but please do not forget the more important fact that Robin really should know the story before she even gets to work. In my opinion it is a crime that Robin does not watch the news or read the news for show prep the previous day.
Posted by inotherwords 01/15/2010 3:04 PM While watching the HTVOD shows I notice how half the time when the camera vuts to her, she is looking at her computer. You would think she could be quick enough to look this stuff up or confirm shit when she thinks she knows something. Benji is really quick on the draw when it comes to that stuff.
Gilbert - The Voice of Us All Show Date: Wednesday 01/13/2010 -- Submitted 01/13/2010 1:10 PM by Joe Bell
During the news about the Haiti earthquake, Howard brought up Robin's Guatemala trip. He asked if American Airlines flew to Guatamela, and Robin for once, admitted she didn't know. What made this even more memorable is Gilbert Gottfried's swift reply that "a reporter would."
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/20/2010 1:49 AM Expand the purpose of this site to just bitch about Robin Quivers? I respond loudly No. There are other sites which do that well, and they are very crowded with all of the complaints. I like that this site is trimmed down to legitimate errors on this supposed news gatherer. Leaving in all of the other
clutter (and god knows there's a lot) about how awful she is merely dilutes her mistakes. The board will look like a place just to vent and will lose its' grand purpose, to make Robin look like the great fool she is. It's like taking an expensive cut of steak and smothering it with catsup.
Posted by Al 01/15/2010 11:59 PM Robin is flying with the u.n. they might be making the travel arrangements and that would answer your question as to why she didn't know
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/14/2010 1:12 PM You are absolutely correct, Big Tex. There was a reporter who is doing a story on Robin sitting in the studio, and Howard was interviewing him a lot.
Gilbert's remark was addressed to him.
Posted by Big Tex 01/14/2010 7:55 AM I think Gilbert was talking about the reporter sitting in from American Way magazine.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/14/2010 1:40 AM I'm all in favor of being a web site that just pointing out how stupid Robin is and how much she is hated.
Posted by Truvia 01/13/2010 11:55 PM Anyone really think Robin is booking her own travel arrangements for her humanitarian trip to Guatemala? She is going through a travel agent or letting her assistant do it.
Oh, and I think Michael made some valid points and suggestions.
Posted by bibi 01/13/2010 9:48 PM How could u miss this one? Robin said she was personally touched by the Haitian earthquake because her driver is from Haiti!!
Posted by Admin 01/13/2010 8:14 PM "Robin not knowing if AA flies into Guatemala isn't something any reporter is expected to know off the top of their head."
Not any random reporter, true. But what about a News Woman who has been talking for weeks about her intention to go to Guatemala and who usually flies AA when she travels? Isn't that a bit odd that she has no idea if they even fly there?
Posted by Michael 01/13/2010 7:32 PM Lest some people might think only Robin Observer submissions are disagreed with, permit me to respectfully and peacefully question this submission.
When Robin admits she does not know an answer, she is to be applauded, and Joe pointed out this positive aspect.
Technically, however, Robin not knowing if AA flies into Guatemala isn't something any reporter is expected to know off the top of their head.
Gilbert was making a teasing joke. There is no way Gilbert was being literal when he said as a reporter Robin should know if AA services Guatemala.
Robin should know the major news headlines of the previous day. She should not know what airline flies to some small country.
This is neither a goof or a gaffe or a wrong, per the words at the top of this Website.
But of course Admin is the owner of this site, and he absolutely can post any submission he desires. I would just ask that Admin maybe remove those words at the top of this site if he has decided to take such a liberal stance. If Admin redefines the purpose of this site, no one could ever post a disagreeing comment. Ever!
If this site was just a place where people can post EVERYTHING Robin says or does that affects the submitter in any way whatsoever, whether negative or not negative, there would never be any dispute or disagreement whatsoever.
So, how about it? Just make this site a blog to post everything about Robin, and remove the references to a "wrong," a "gaffe," or a "goof." Let it just be a free-for-all referencing everything about Robin. If Robin's hair style is annoying a submitter, let that be allowed to be posted here, as one wild example.
6% is the New Half Show Date: Wednesday 01/13/2010 -- Submitted 01/13/2010 10:09 AM by Robin Observer
Robin was listing the celebrities who share Howard's birthday January 12. When she got to Heather Mills, she described her as the woman "who totally embarrassed Paul McCartney by marrying him and taking half his money." While the marriage may have been embarrassing to to McCartney, he did relatively well re the settlement. Heather was awarded $48,700,000 out of Paul's net worth of $800,000,000, about 6%. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,338268,00.html
Posted by Robin Observer 01/17/2010 6:16 PM I thought Rodney King had a good idea. Why don't we try to get along!
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/17/2010 3:46 PM I, for one, have not missed The Amazed Listener at all. It has been very peaceful on this site since TAL left, until of course Robin Observer decided to be condescending towards anyone who would dare post a comment disagreeing with one of his submissions.
I do not miss The Amazed Listener finding it necessary to shout his name in all capital letters.
I do not miss The Amazed Listener finding it necessary to talk about himself in the third person.
I do not miss The Amazed Listener finding it necessary to tell everyone he created this character called The Amazed Listener.
And I certainly do not miss The Amazed Listener finding it necessary to be condescending towards any commenter who would dare disagree with a posting they find to be weak and/or inaccurate.
I do not miss The Amazed Listener's lack of humility.
And I certainly agree with so many others here who have posted disagreeing comments about Robin Observer. Yes, I like Robin Observer's submissions that have not been disagreed with by anyone. I am sure we all do. But I dislike the way Robin Observer has handled himself when it comes to his reactions and insults and condescension to the disagreeing commenters.
I cannot imagine anyone thinking it is OK that Robin Observer call a commenter someone lacking reading comprehension ability.
And I find it odd that Robin Observer doesn't back off his condescension when he realizes more than one person disagrees with a few of his submissions.
Posted by Rodney King 01/16/2010 8:40 PM Can't we all just get along?!?!?!?!?
Posted by robinscucumber 01/16/2010 6:43 PM As usual , Robin Observer, you are correct.We have missed you, The Amazed Listener.
Posted by THE AMAZED LISTENER 01/15/2010 9:54 PM Robin Observer: People are comparing you with me. Be careful - if you start writing in capital letters, you may cause a riot. Keep up the good work on your submissions! Ignore the critics!!
Posted by Ora 01/15/2010 7:19 PM I completely agree with Anonymous below and with Harriet.
Robin Observer, I personally couldn't care who the person is who is making entries to this site.
I just enjoy reading when Robin makes an error she clearly should not make.
You do not seem to ever have a problem when some makes a positive comment on a submission that no one could possibly take issue with.
But God forbid someone might have a comment that calls into question whether a submission is truly what they consider a true Robin gaffe, and you go on the attack, often calling the commenter a name or belittling them because they themselves do not make submissions.
Just because you make a submission does not excuse you if that submission is weak.
A true humilty person would take a step back and think, gee, if more than one person is feeling my submission is not a true Robin gaffe, perhaps I should respect them for taking the time to express it. And they inturn will appreciate you intelligently discussing the matter, as long as you don't insult them and call them Robin or say they have no reading comprehension ability.
Robin Observer, I respectfully submit my opinion that you are so wrong in this matter and the way you handle yourself.
Please keep submitting solid submissions, of course, and please stop belittling anyone who might challenge your submission. Most are not challenged, as you know.
Thank you,
Ora
Posted by Ora 01/15/2010 7:17 PM I completely agree with Anonymous below and with Harriet.
Robin Observer, I personally couldn't care who the person is who is making entries to this site.
I just enjoy reading when Robin makes an error she clearly should not make.
You do not seem to ever have a problem when some makes a positive comment on a submission that no one could possibly take issue with.
But God forbid someone might have a comment that calls into question whether a submission is truly what they consider a true Robin gaffe, and you go on the attack, often calling the commenter a name or belittling them because they themselves do not make submissions.
Just because you make a submission does not excuse you if that submission is weak.
A true humilty person would take a step back and think, gee, if more than one person is feeling my submission is not a true Robin gaffe, perhaps I should respect them for taking the time to express it. And they inturn will appreciate you intelligently discussing the matter, as long as you don't insult them and call them Robin or say they have no reading comprehension ability.
Robin Observer, I respectfully submit my opinion that you are so wrong in this matter and the way you handle yourself.
Please keep submitting solid submissions, of course, and please stop belittling anyone who might challenge your submission. Most are not challenged, as you know.
Thank you,
Ora
Posted by Anonymous (75.212) 01/15/2010 4:36 PM You are obsessed with who submits and does not submit. Who cares who submits? Nobody does but you.
We just want interesting and/or solid material.
And Harriet is right and you are wrong. And she was not necessarily addressing what you specifically were saying that second, but maybe as a whole. How dare you insult her by saying she has no comprehension. You are mean.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/15/2010 1:52 PM Harriet - You said: "Oh, and perhaps Admin took the day off yesterday or didn't have time to post any Robin gaffes." That may be true but what I said was: "I listened to some of Thursday's show and identified at least two Robin gaffes. However, in keeping with my desire that perhaps some of the critics post something for the rest of us to critique, I decided not to post anything and see if someone else like Sara, Michael, AL, TKO, Anonymous (174.123) or even MM might post something. " Is this another example of lack of reading comprehension? I don't know.
OK, here's one for you to submit Harriet - I just heard it within the hour on the replay of the Tuesday January 12, 2010 show in the 9 o'clock hour. Ashley Dupre was in the studio and the subject turned to former Governor Spitzer. Howard referred to his wife as "Hilda." Robin "corrected" Howard, saying her name is "Tilda." Actually her name is "Silda." Just make up a headline and submit it & you can become a submitter!
Posted by Harriet 01/15/2010 11:50 AM Robin Observer, you are unbelievable. I hope you realize how poorly you come off sometimes.
You chastise commenters because perhaps they themselves do not submit postings, implying their comments are less valuable because of that. But this makes no sense. For example: you are not a politician, yet you would be allowed to post a comment about how your politician is doing.
And you do not fault TV or radio commentators who give their opinions daily, yet you are hard on commentors here.
And it is you who are impolite to the commenters. It is not the commenters who are impolite. You are the one who called the commenters Robin and people with a lack of comprehension.
You are exactly like The Amazed Listener who used to do the same exact thing.
Oh, and perhaps Admin took the day off yesterday or didn't have time to post any Robin gaffes. But again, even if commenters choose not to post a submission, their disagreeing opinion for some of the submissions on this site are no less credible. My gosh, you are infuriating, especially because the fact that so many people disagree with you and yet you can't fathom that maybe you are off base here. How many people have to disagree with you before you might accept you just might be wrong here? I am neither any of those commenters you referenced and yet I disagree with you.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/15/2010 5:40 AM I listened to some of Thursday's show and identified at least two Robin gaffes. However, in keeping with my desire that perhaps some of the critics post something for the rest of us to critique, I decided not to post anything and see if someone else like Sara, Michael, AL, TKO, Anonymous (174.123) or even MM might post something. No such luck so far. Perhaps the critics should be more polite in their criticism so that those who post original postings will feel like submitting additional ones. You all have a nice weekend!
Posted by Sara 01/14/2010 6:04 PM Robin Observer just called some commenters people who posses the trait of lacking reading comprehension ability.
You are very hurtful, Robin Observer. (And I think it was you who originally started calling someone who disagreed with your posting "Robin." As if there is absolutely no merit to a disagreeing opinion, in spite of the fact usually more than one person disagrees with a particular submission in question.)
You know, I have never heard most of the other regular submitters to this site ever insult a commenter by saying that commenter lacked reading comprehension ability.
When you call a "critic" Robin for making a disagreeing comment, you ARE being critical. How can you not see that?
And I have read a lot of the disagreeing comments on this site, and I for one do not find the commenters to lack reading comprehension at all.
Just look at the comments for the Gilbert submission above this one. Thanks to a commenter or two, we now know that Gilbert's reporter comment was made to the visiting reporter in the studio and NOT to Robin Quivers. (How can you not respect those commenters for pointing this out?)
Posted by Robin Observer 01/14/2010 4:42 PM One common trait of critics who submit to this site is their lack of reading comprehension ability. My comment wasn't critical of critics, it merely expressed my wish that those who criticize also submit postings. Please don't take this site so seriously. I have had many submissions screened out by the Admin - you don't see me lashing out. The Admin has their own view of what is an acceptable posting - I don't always agree and often don't understand the Admin's rationale for rejecting a submission. I just submit another one and see what happens. Frankly, I could find something to criticize about many submissions by others, but I only do so occasionally. That's my decision and I can't control the desires of those who consider their role to be that of critiquing those who take the time to create original postings here.
Posted by TKO 01/14/2010 4:17 PM Why does it matter if a disagreer (or critic as you put it) is also a submitted?
Almost every disageeing comment has some validity in the sense someone will agree with it.
It is sad some submitters have such a big ego they have to attack the commenters who hold an opposing viewpoint.
If the commenters were not attacked in the first place, such as being called Robin Quivers, perhaps they wouldn't feel the need to have the last word.
If more than one person disagrees with a submission, why not just be humble and defend your opinion without personally attacking the commenter?
Posted by Robin Observer 01/14/2010 2:59 PM What I'd like to see is some of you critics who want to have the last word, instead, have the first word by submitting original postings of your own that the rest of us can critique. I won't name names - you know who you are.
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/14/2010 1:14 PM Rob, sounds like it is you who desires the last word as well, and not just Michael.
Posted by Rob 01/14/2010 11:28 AM Michael, You seem to be like the child who has to have the last word here. Your comment here was totally unnecessary other then to say "see I was right". Grow up and enjoy the submissions here for what they are.
Posted by Michael 01/13/2010 7:20 PM See? When the submission is solid, no one says anything in disagreement.
This is a solid submission.
Robin Tells Howard Of A Job Opening At 'America's Got Talent' When The Job Has Already Been Filled Show Date: Tuesday 01/12/2010 -- Submitted 01/12/2010 9:09 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Howard was talking about Simon Cowell leaving "American Idol." Howard said he wouldn't take that job.
Robin chimed in proclaiming there are two similar TV judging jobs Howard could take now. Robin seriously told Howard in addition to replacing Simon Cowell on "Idol," Howard could replace the departing David Hasselhoff on "America's Got Talent."
Robin was wrong...again. It has been widely reported all over the media that Hasselhoff's job has been filled by Howie Mandel.
The Mandel hiring was a huge news story yesterday.
Posted by Al 01/13/2010 7:07 PM Thanks for telling me this is the first i heard of it (not even joking)
Posted by Anonymous (70.213) 01/12/2010 9:38 PM Quivers is too busy getting enemas and drinking disgusting drinks. She has no time to check the entertainment headlines for her high paying job.
Quivers should really give back some of her pay. She doesn't deserve it.
Insert Your Own Joke, Please. Show Date: Tuesday 01/12/2010 -- Submitted 01/12/2010 3:58 PM by Bad Santa
During Howard's discussion of David Letterman's unusually candid comments about Jay Leno, Robin interrupted to repeat Howard's critical comments of Paul Schaeffer's running background commentary.
Robin Quivers--Annoyed By Interruptions And Complaining About Those Who Parrot Comments Of A Show Host.
This is so easy that I have decided to let you guys insert your own joke in the comments section.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/13/2010 1:11 PM If Robin was at the front door of my house yelling to be let in and a stray flea bitten dog was at the back door barking to be let in, I'd let the dog in. At least he'd quit barking once he was inside.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/13/2010 1:08 PM I thought that was great too D-Bagz. John Hein claimed he was going to play a clip of what he said to Robin but I never heard if he did. That's the only reason I wish Howard would bring Jackie the Joke Man in a couple of times. He always busted Robin's balls and called her on things like that.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/13/2010 3:07 AM I love how on the wrap up show (monday I think) Jason talked about how Robin always repeats everything other people say like it was her idea. It's finally public knowledge, Robin is a parrot! I think "I was gonna say..." should be on her gravestone epitaph.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/12/2010 9:33 PM Why does Howard break wind more than Robin?
Because Robin can't shut up long enough to build up the required pressure.
If Robin ever married, it would be a case where her husband would never talk to her for years...because he won't want to interrupt her.
Posted by Michael 01/12/2010 9:01 PM In this case, Robin is both the pot AND the kettle.
Quiversus Interruptus Show Date: Tuesday 01/12/2010 -- Submitted 01/12/2010 8:06 AM by Robin Observer
William Shatner was on the show with George Takai on the phone. Shatner was speaking when Robin decided to interrupt him with a question. Three words in, Shatner asked Robin not to interrupt him. Undeterred, 34 Quivers insisted on continuing to interrupt Shatner. Here was a conversation between the greatest broadcaster in history & 2 great TV actors and movie stars and Robin thought the audience would care what she was thinking.
Later in the interview, Howard asked Shatner whether he had had any gay experiences, asking his standard towel snapping incident question. A couple of minutes later, Robin asked Shatner if he had ever been involved in a towel snapping incident. One wonders what Robin is doing between interruptions. Surely not paying attention to the show!
Posted by HeHateMe 01/13/2010 1:04 PM Robin is such an idiot. She ruins the show for me. I hope she just disappears when she goes to Guatemala.
Posted by Anonymous (24.128) 01/13/2010 7:08 AM Your mistake is thinking that Robin cares if the listeners want to hear her talk. She is just interested in hearing her own voice, and the rest of the world be damned.
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/13/2010 1:11 AM I love reading this stuff but technically this isn't really a mistake on her part, just annoying as hell.
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/12/2010 8:59 PM We all know that Robin constantly interrupts interviews. (She's been doing it for years.)
We all know Robin doesn't always listens to the interviews. (Many times she will ask a question that has been asked already.)
This is nothing new.
You will find many similar submissions on this site.
No It Wouldn't Have Been Show Date: Tuesday 01/12/2010 -- Submitted 01/12/2010 6:50 AM by Robin Observer
Howard's sister Ellen phoned in to wish Howard a Happy Birthday. During the conversation, it was explained that 2 years after Ellen was born, Mrs. Stern (Rae) suffered a miscarriage. Subsequently, Howard was conceived & born. Always wanting to insert herself into the conversation with any inane comment, Robin chimed in that if the fetus that had been miscarried had instead been born, "That would have been you (Howard)!" For a former nurse to say that, she must really be stupid. Of course, the baby would have been Ellen's younger brother, but conceived out of a unique egg & sperm, it wouldn't have been Howard.
Posted by Rob 01/14/2010 10:48 AM Anonymous (70.213), I did not say that a majority of Robin Observer's post were not being targeted. I said the complete opposite, that they were being targeted. I also think that admin has the right to put in his site whatever he wants to and the rest of us should not complain about it. Or if we have a complaint then we should direct it at the admin and not the poster. We all interpret things differently and should not be targeted because someone disagrees with anyone's opinion.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/13/2010 12:58 PM I'm sure even dumbass Robin knows her 'joke' was not factually correct, but what an ignorant thing to say to just hear yourself talk. Good submission.
Posted by nigga 01/13/2010 8:38 AM She can't be that wacky, sound too stupid, even for her.
Posted by Dora 01/13/2010 8:05 AM I thought this was funny as well as a great of example of Robin's need to sputter forth words, just to hear herself speak. I didnt hear this on the show, but reading it made me chuckle. I think this one is totally mistake worthy.
Posted by Anonymous (70.213) 01/12/2010 9:46 PM Rob, how can you say that. The majority of Robin Observer's posts have not been targeted. In fact, some have been complimented.
Admin is right to leave this here since he is the only opinion that counts, but Michael is right when he says Robin was not being literal.
Maybe it is not a case of Robin observer being targeted, but more a case of it just looks that way because Robin Observer sends in so many submissions. With so many submissions, of course you might get a few disagreeing comments.
Posted by Rob 01/12/2010 9:27 PM Good call Admin. it appears some people have put a target on Robin Observer and are taking shots at all of his/her submissions.
Posted by Admin 01/12/2010 9:09 PM Believe me, Michael, I reject more submissions than you know. Not all of my rejections end up on the Rejected page. Deciding by a hair whether a submission should or should not be approved is not a job I particularly enjoy, but it's one I do with the intention of maintaining the quality of the site as best I can.
Sometimes I make a bad judgment and end up retracting a submission. In this case, I agree with Robin Observer that it was a stupid (and factually incorrect) comment by Robin, and I think it's a bit stronger than you do. This submission is going to stay. Thanks for your feedback.
Posted by Michael 01/12/2010 8:56 PM Come on, Robin Observer! Do you really think Robin was being literal here?
Of course she was not speaking literally.
Look, I am annoyed with Robin Quivers just as much if not more than you. And just because I and some others might disagree with one of your many submissions doesn't make me or them a Robin sympathizer.
I am just one who speaks up when I see anything unfair. And this submission is completely unfair to Robin.
I heard this live and there is no doubt that Robin was not speaking literally. Robin knows damn well the dead fetus could not have literally been Howard Stern.
If the fetus had come to term, and if it was a boy, there is a great shot Ma and Pa Stern would have named that boy Howard. So, that fetus would have been a "Howard Stern" but not necessarily THE Howard Stern of today.
Admin, please, there are enough really strong "Robin's Wrongs." The weaker ones like this one diminish the credibility and/or impact of the strong errors.
Some of Robin Observer's submissions are too weak to be included on your site. I hope you will reconsider this one.
"Jones" "Ferguson" Whatever Show Date: Monday 01/11/2010 -- Submitted 01/11/2010 9:45 AM by Robin Observer
Ever the expert on all subjects, Robin mentioned that there's an NFL player named "D'Brickashaw Jones" according to her. Actually, his name is D'Brickashaw Ferguson & he plays for the NY Jets.
Posted by Rob 01/11/2010 4:10 PM Also to add a little bit more to this. Robin who wants everyoneto think she knows so much about sports specifically said she never heard of Chad Ochocinco. Now anyone who has ever heard of the NFL would have heard of Chad Ochocinco, even f they did not know who he played for they would have heard his name because it is mentioned so often.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/11/2010 12:26 PM Just to add a tiny bit of context to this submission:
The topic of conversation was sports players who adopt interesting and memorable names, which Howard finds humorous.
Howard went on and on about Bengals wide receiver Chad Ochocinco.
Robin, always craving to participate, did one of her jump-ins where she makes an error.
Robin: "I know someone named D'Brickashaw Jones!"
Gary, in the studio at the time involved in the conversation, without missing a beat, corrected Robin and said "D'Brickashaw Ferguson."
So, Robin made a bigger fool of herself because she started her comment with the words "I know." We all know how much Robin knows.
Posted by Dora 01/11/2010 11:54 AM She loves to fancy herself as a sports expert, yet she always scews up sports names, teams etc. She really needs to leave the sports commentary to Gary and John.
Robin Prefers "Black" Show Date: Monday 01/11/2010 -- Submitted 01/11/2010 8:20 AM by Robin Observer
The gang was discussing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's comments about Barack Obama that he thought Obama was electable because he is "light-skinned" and doesn't speak with a "Negro" dialect. The discussion evolved to the question of what expression should be used in reference to black people. Examples such as "black" and "African-American" were brought up and concerning the latter expression, Robin blurted out that she didn't like it (and prefers "black") because "We've never been African." It is not believed necessary to cite thousands of references to prove that American blacks living today descended from African peoples.
Admin Note: I agree with Robin on this. I'm descended from English, French and Swedish people centuries ago. That doesn't, in my opinion, make me European American. If you were born in America and your parents were born in America, you're just American.
Posted by Admin 01/20/2010 4:46 PM It might be semantics, Torico, but I disagree. Where you are born has a lot to do with your nationality.
Posted by Torico 01/20/2010 8:28 AM Well if your parents are both African, then it makes you African, the location you were born has nothing to do with it.
Posted by Anonymous (216.229) 01/12/2010 3:26 PM I can't believee she actually said something I agree with. If a Republican said what he did then they would be run out of town. Since a liberal said it nothing is being done.
Posted by Anonymous (70.187) 01/11/2010 12:31 PM Another score for Admin for his call on this one.
Hypocrite Quivers Show Date: Thursday 01/07/2010 -- Submitted 01/07/2010 7:37 AM by Robin Observer
The gang was discussing the fact that the New York Post published an item in Page 6 today reporting that Artie Lange had attempted suicide. During the discussion, Robin weighed in: "If it's a relative of yours, you don't go running to the press." Her point was that Artie is a member of the Howard Stern Show "family" and family members don't help disseminate negative information to the public about other members of the family. The implication was that reading the Page 6 article on the air would amount to "dissing" a member of the family. Apparently, this is a recent "conversion" by Robin since she willingly revealed the details of her abused upbringing at the hands of her parents when she wrote and published QUIVERS A LIFE. No one condones what her parents did to her, particularly her father, but when there was a buck to be made, Robin jumped in with both feet to provide all the excruciating and disgusting details we couldn't have possibly learned without her assistance. Wasn't this "running to the press?" Here's a review of the audio book version of QUIVERS A LIFE:
From Library Journal
Some folks may be turned off by this tape because of Quivers's affiliation with The Howard Stern Show. If so, they'll miss the riveting story of a woman who survived in spite of abuse from both her parents, periodic bouts of depression, and self-doubt. Though Quivers does cover her relationship with Stern, most of the audiobook is devoted to her life outside of radio. There is discussion of the loss of her first love, a foster child she helped her parents to raise and subsequently wanted to adopt; her experience with a cult-like program; her years as a nurse; and how she managed to avoid a life of prostitution. Quivers gives a somewhat emotionless reading, but her detachment tends to draw the listener in. This is a wonderful recording that should find a home in all libraries.?Danna C. Bell-Russel, District of Columbia P.L.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Posted by HeHateMe 01/13/2010 1:12 PM Nice one Baddabing.
Posted by baddabing 01/10/2010 6:22 PM Hippo-Twit!
Posted by Somers 01/08/2010 3:48 PM I am going to jump into the ring here.
Sorry, Robin Observer, I agree with Dora and the others.
And I would hope as you see more than one commenter disagrees with your submission you might get less upset.
And since you have had more than one submission disagreed with, you will get less upset and not attack the commenter.
Robin is wrong so much, as we all know. And we know you are working hard to submit everything possible. And thanks for that. But maybe take a little extra time and really think the submission out.
For me, this submission clearly is off base. And I don't understand how you could not see the huge differences here as nicely articulated by Michael.
I hope Admin removes this one.
Posted by Tradio Tramp 01/08/2010 11:51 AM I agree with both Dora and Michael. And I would like to point out that even if Robin was referring to the members of the show as a family, as Michael nicely pointed out, there is a big difference between someone telling the newspaper a coworker attempted suicide and revealing one's own history of being molested by their father.
And it doesn't matter if Robin revealed it on the show or via a book. It is her right to tell that story.
Robin Observer trying to compare the two things just doesn't make sense.
I can tell Robin Observer dislikes Robin. A lot of us dislike her. But the submissions to this site should be more thought out please.
Posted by Dora 01/08/2010 8:09 AM I agree with Michael on this one. I think he articulated the problem with this post very well. I had to read this one several times, as I just was not understanding where the mistake was. Sorry Robin Observer I respectfully disagree with this post.
Posted by Michael 01/08/2010 1:34 AM To Robin's Observer: That's not what I got out of Robin's comment "If it's a relative of yours, you don't go running to the press."
The way I heard it: Howard was attempting to speculate who it was that would go to the press and reveal Artie's attempted suicide. Of course, everyone would speculate that it was not a family member who would typically reveal such a personal thing to the press. So they were basically ruling that out.
It was then discussed who maybe would have leaked the story to the press. They mentioned it could be a medical worker, someone who had access to the police report, etc.
So Robin was not implying no one at the show would release the story because they are all a "family." She was backing up Howard's assessment that Artie's family would not be the ones responsible for leaking the story to the press.
And I would also take issue on your point about how Robin releasing information of molestation about her own family is the same as a family member leaking a suicide attempt to the press. I disagree with you completely. OK, first of all Robin being molested by her dad had to do with herself being a victim directly, so she had a right to release that information, just like many other celebrities do. Such as McKenzie Phillips telling the world she screwed her dad.
There is a difference between releasing tragic info about someone else (such as if Howard squealed on Artie) and tragic information about yourself personally, such as if you were raped by your dad.
I am not Robin. I am just someone who is offering an opinion, as I am entitled to do. So please do not call me Robin.
I think you are wrong yet again with one of your submissions, and I am allowed to question them. When your submissions are strong, I and no one offers opposing viewpoints. Robin was not wrong or out of line in any way here.
This submission should be removed, in my opinion.
Robin Messes Up The News Story Concerning The Nexus One Google Phone Show Date: Wednesday 01/06/2010 -- Submitted 01/06/2010 1:43 PM by O-Qua Tangin Wann
Another example of Robin not watching or reading the news in preparation for her job. Please know that the Nexus One was all over the news media yesterday. The coverage was extensive.
Admin Note: To be more specific, the phone is available now either without service (insert your own SIM card) or with T-Mobile service, so OQTW is right. It will be available with Verizon service and Vodafone service (Europe) this spring. Another case of Robin not reading before she reports.
Posted by Michael 01/08/2010 1:46 AM I would add that Robin's incorrect information caused Howard to make a joke that absolutely didn't apply.
Because Robin specifically said the Google Phone won't be out until the spring, Howard replied that people are already starting to line up for it.
Oh, and what an idiot Robin is to report the Google Phone will be called Vodafone in Europe. Most people who have traveled through Europe have seen lots of ads for Vodafone cell phone service.
I like this one since it is Robin reporting a news story and getting multiple facts wrong.
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/06/2010 7:35 PM Admin, Robin made a second big factual error at the end of her news report on this story.
Robin specifically said the Google Phone will be called "Vodafone" in Europe.
The Google Phone will be called Nexus One in Europe just like it is here in the USA. As you pointed out, Admin, the phone will be available for use on the Vodafone cell network in Europe.
Per Wikipedia: Vodafone Group is a British multinational mobile network operator headquartered in Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom. Vodafone is the world's largest mobile telecommunication network company, based on revenue.
My hunch was that you'd want this mistake lumped into this submission rather than on its own because it falls under Robin messing up the news story concerning the Google Phone.
Fox News Sunday With?? Show Date: Tuesday 01/05/2010 -- Submitted 01/05/2010 4:38 PM by ATE
Her Highness stated that Brit Hume was the host for FOX News Sunday. As Wikipedia states, he is merely a "regular panelist on Fox News Sunday." FOX News Sunday is hosted by Chris Wallace. Imagine all the blunders if Robin actually hosted anything.
Posted by Michael 01/08/2010 1:48 AM I agree with Dora. Good catch, ATE. But no surprise that Robin doesn't watch most news shows.
Posted by Dora 01/06/2010 8:01 AM The show he actually does host is Special Report with Brit Hume. I love that the news woman got this wrong. Cood catch!
No More Drugs in the FDA Show Date: Tuesday 01/05/2010 -- Submitted 01/05/2010 10:16 AM by Robin Observer
The gang was playing a homeless game and the homeless person was asked "What does FDA stand for?" The reply: "Federal Administration for Food." The correct answer would have been "Food and Drug Administration." Robin's comment: "She got the right department, she just didn't say it right." For it to be the "right department," wouldn't there have to be a mention of the "Drug" aspect? Not on Planet Imbecile!
I am a a member of the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), and oh how I wish Robin was right about this one...but she was dead wrong.
Before the holiday break, Howard shared with everyone that he was one of the fortunate people randomly selected to be on the nominating committee for this year's SAG Awards.
This morning, Howard told the audience about all the movies he was able to watch over the holidays, while also giving his reviews of course.
Howard was able to watch so many quality movies because as a SAG Nominating Committee Member, you get DVD screeners of all the films the studios want you to nominate.
Howard specifically told Robin the only reason he got all those movies is because he was selected a Nominating Committee Member.
Robin argued back stating with 100% certainty that ALL members of the Screen Actors Guild will get ALL the DVD screeners that Howard and all Nominating Committee Members received.
Robin was dead wrong. As of 2007, there were 120,000 members of SAG. Robin is a fool to state that all 120,000+ members get all the DVD screeners. We absolutely do not. Only the 4,200 randomly selected Nominating Committee Members get all the screeners. Occasionally, a studio will send a DVD or two to every SAG member after the nominations are announced, if that studio has the budget to lay out that expense and if that studio is really desperate to get an award.
Posted by D-Bagz 01/09/2010 2:54 PM OQTW is a screen actor?
Posted by Al 01/07/2010 5:55 PM Im glad you got it i was just kidding
Posted by O-Qua Tangin Wann 01/06/2010 7:43 PM Hey, Al, let me tell you, I personally would prefer Robin to be factually correct, especially when it comes to reporting the news. It irritates me that she makes all that money and does not take her job seriously.
But even if she didn't have that specific job, I would hope Robin would watch the news just so she could keep herself informed of what is going on.
Many of Robin's news article flubs would never exist if Robin would just watch or read the news each night/morning (like a lot of people do).
Most of the factual errors I pick up in Robin's news stories (like the two big errors in her reporting of the Google Phone) is from the fact I already heard about the story the day before. And if I know the basic facts, shouldn't Robin also know them since she is being paid to report and discuss them?
OQTW
P.S. Al/Robin, I laughed at your comment. Good one.
Posted by Al 01/06/2010 6:53 PM you never wish I'm oops i mean Robins right
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/05/2010 1:40 PM Good one, O-Qua. The Duchess Quivers threw up to Howard in her argument that she is a SAG member herself in an effort to bolster her expertise in the subject. She said she is so sure she and all SAG members will be getting all the DVD's Howard received, trying to make Howard feel that he receiving those DVD's was nothing special.
Well, no SAG member outside the Nominating Committee has received a single movie DVD as of today. The ballots have been received by all members and are due back shortly, with the show airing January 23.
Robin has been a SAG member for years now. How does she make this kind of mistake when she is a member?
The show lost Artie Lange but should have lost The Duchess Quivers instead.
"Network," "Roundtable," BFD! Show Date: Monday 01/04/2010 -- Submitted 01/04/2010 9:10 AM by Robin Observer
During a discussion of Howard's recent visit to the Stern Fan Network website, Robin interrupted referring to it as the "Stern Fan Roundtable." She quickly corrected herself but this points out that Robin didn't make a New Year's resolution to try to stop interrupting Howard and blurting out things before thinking about them.
Posted by Mr. Jombi 01/05/2010 10:13 PM Who was it again that said "Put brain in gear before opening mouth"? Robin could sure learn a lot from Evil Dave.
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/05/2010 1:46 PM Rob, usually the extended bickering over the strength of a post is caused by the original submitter of said post insulting the commenter.
If the original submitter would be gracious and accept that everyone has their opinion and has a right to express said opinion, there would be no extended bickering.
You have read many strong posts that no one questions.
You have read many weaker posts that people disagree with.
All opinions should be welcome and accepted, whether negative or positive.
And if a submitter gets a negative comment expressing the feeling the posting is weak, how about the original submitter just addressing why they feel the post is not weak instead of personally attacking the commenter?
Posted by Rob 01/05/2010 11:10 AM Well said Robin Observer, I think this bickering over the validity of posts here has gotten out of hand. I've sent in posts that never made it to the site and I'm sure it is because Admin felt they were not worthy of posting, so be it. I also think that the Admin here should make the decision as he does and if it makes the site than nobody should complain to the poster about it. It's a decision made by the Admin and that should be accepted.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/04/2010 9:49 PM I haven't attacked anyone nor have I complained. Re-read my comments and you'll see this is true. Apparently, jokingly saying that Al & MM are really Robin has hit a little too close to home. Apparently suggesting a pro-Robin website where Robin defenders can submit posts wasn't received in the humorous spirit with which it was conveyed. Please grow a sense of humor Al & MM and don't take this site so seriously! People who post Robin's gaffes here are just trying to have a little fun at Robin's expense. If that's not your idea of fun, so be it. You remind me of residents of Washington DC who root for the Dallas Cowboys. God forbid had I submitted comments in all capital letters!
Posted by Al 01/04/2010 8:43 PM Robin Observer your right this is Robin you jackass.
Posted by Anonymous (174.123) 01/04/2010 7:56 PM Dear Robin Observer,
You are beginning to come across like The Amazed Listener used to come across. And that's sad since most of your submissions are strong.
Have you noticed that when your submission is strong, no one complains?
Why can't you be more gracious like some of the other submitters who have welcomed comments that might question the strength of the submission? Submitters such as Dora, OQTW, Bad Santa, etc., are so gracious when one of their submissions is considered weak.
A true strong submission is one where no one can post a negative comment.
The submission here, is not one of those strong ones. So let people like Al (who is right in this instance), MM, Someone Not Robin, and myself post our objection to this weak submission without you calling us Robin Quivers.
Please just keep the peace.
And please do not turn into TAL, II.
Thank you.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/04/2010 7:44 PM "Posted by Al 01/04/2010 6:48 PM
Hey Robin Observer if your post wasn't so weak nobody could say anything stop complaining and submit better posts. "
Nice hearing from you, Robin!
Posted by Al 01/04/2010 6:48 PM Hey Robin Observer if your post wasn't so weak nobody could say anything stop complaining and submit better posts.
Posted by someone who is not Robin 01/04/2010 4:33 PM I am not Robin or Al or MM.
I agree with what MM said, though. This is an honest slip of the tongue and should be forgiven.
I am getting the feeling Robin Observer is attacking the commenters instead if being humble. Everyone can have their own opinion.
Posted by Robin Observer 01/04/2010 2:36 PM Whenever I see comments from MM or Al, I just assume it's really Robin herself. There is a website called Robinswright that used to support everything Robin said. There hasn't been activity there for a couple of years. Al & MM, why don't you see if the moderator of that website can be convinced to receive your Robin-supporting postings!
Posted by Dora 01/04/2010 1:45 PM Personally I think it counts as a mistake. Stern Fan Network was in existence long before the Stern Fan Roundtable Show. The Admin thought it was significant enough to post. He (or She?) has in fact rejected a fair amount of submissions that were minor mistakes. I think given that the Roundtable is a featured show and the topic has come up regularly, this mistake counts. But perhaps I am in the minority here...
Posted by MM 01/04/2010 1:07 PM Come on, Admin. Robin Observer is submitting some truly weak ones like this one. This is true nitpicking.
I hate Robin as much as everyone, but since there are so many solid errors she makes, these truly nitpicking ones diminish the seriousness of the solid ones.
Mutt hosts Super Fan Round Table. Mutt is the owner of the Stern Fan Network.
Sometimes in the fast give and take of a conversation, people make a slip of the tongue. Plus, it is very early in the morning.
And when Robin corrects herself, can't we forgive such trivial accidental stuff?
When Robin makes a factual error while reporting a news story because she failed to do research, of course we can fault her hard for that.
But Howard and everyone makes slips of the tongue. Let's leave these out of this site because we want Robin's real errors to be taken seriously.
I applaud Robin Observer for wanting to contribute to this site, but I fear he is going a bit overboard by just wanting to submit everything, no matter how trivial. Most other submitters to this site do not do that. They try to make the submissions be because of a substantial error by Robin.
New Decade, Same Old Quivers Show Date: Monday 01/04/2010 -- Submitted 01/04/2010 9:06 AM by Robin Observer
The gang was discussing the death of Brittany Murphy at 32 years of age. While talking about the news stories reporting that Murphy may have died of natural causes, Robin blurted out: "There's no natural cause of death at 32!" Au contraire, Ms. Quivers, many young people age 32 or younger die of "natural causes." The following links to two articles are exemplary: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/564704; http://cardiovascres.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/50/2/399. One wonders if Robin received her nursing degree from the same school where Dr. Ronnie received her "degree."
Posted by D-Bagz 01/04/2010 11:03 PM HAH! C'mon Dr. Roni is a bona fide doctor of "naturalistic" medicine, and 2 out of 3 members of my local conspiracy group agree that that's alright!!!
Posted by MM 01/04/2010 1:10 PM The first link does not lead to any articles we can read, Robin Observer.
This one is a solid submission. Robin told everyone that a person 32 years old cannot die of natural causes. If a person has a heart defect, they can die at that young age, and that would be considered dying of natural causes.